Skip to main content

Comparison with Other Libraries

How does ZK-Kit compare to other zero-knowledge and cryptographic libraries?

Quick Comparison​

FeatureZK-KitCircomlibSnarkJSAztecArkworks
LanguageTS/JSCircomJSNoir/TSRust
Merkle Trees✅ 3 types✅ Basic❌✅✅
Signatures✅ EdDSA✅ EdDSA❌✅✅
Encryption✅ Poseidon❌❌✅✅
Audited✅ 5 pkgs⚠️ Partial✅ Yes✅ Yes✅ Yes
TypeScript✅ Native❌✅ Yes✅ Yes❌
Documentation✅ Full⚠️ Basic✅ Good✅ Good✅ Good
Production Use✅ High✅ High✅ High✅ Medium✅ High

Detailed Comparisons​

vs Circomlib​

Circomlib is a library of circuits for Circom.

When to use ZK-Kit:

  • ✅ Building TypeScript/JavaScript applications
  • ✅ Need ready-to-use Merkle trees
  • ✅ Want modular, npm-installable packages
  • ✅ Need comprehensive TypeScript types

When to use Circomlib:

  • ✅ Writing custom circuits
  • ✅ Need low-level circuit components
  • ✅ Building on existing Circom infrastructure

Can you use both? Yes! ZK-Kit often complements Circomlib:

// ZK-Kit for application logic
import { IMT } from "@zk-kit/imt"
const tree = new IMT(poseidon2, 16, 0, 2)

// Circomlib circuits for proofs
// circuit.circom uses circomlib's Poseidon

vs SnarkJS​

SnarkJS is a JavaScript implementation of zkSNARK schemes.

When to use ZK-Kit:

  • ✅ Need high-level primitives (trees, signatures)
  • ✅ Building applications, not proof systems
  • ✅ Want batteries-included solutions

When to use SnarkJS:

  • ✅ Generating and verifying custom zk-SNARKs
  • ✅ Working with Groth16/PLONK proofs
  • ✅ Need low-level proof generation

Can you use both? Yes! ZK-Kit handles data structures, SnarkJS handles proofs:

// ZK-Kit manages state
import { IMT } from "@zk-kit/imt"
const tree = new IMT(poseidon2, 16, 0, 2)

// SnarkJS generates proofs
import { groth16 } from "snarkjs"
const { proof, publicSignals } = await groth16.fullProve(...)

vs Semaphore​

Semaphore is a protocol for anonymous signaling built on ZK.

Relationship:

  • Semaphore uses ZK-Kit packages
  • ZK-Kit provides the building blocks
  • Semaphore provides the protocol

When to use ZK-Kit:

  • ✅ Building custom zero-knowledge applications
  • ✅ Need Merkle trees for your own use case
  • ✅ Want flexibility to design your protocol

When to use Semaphore:

  • ✅ Need anonymous signaling specifically
  • ✅ Want a complete, ready-made protocol
  • ✅ Building on Semaphore infrastructure

vs Aztec​

Aztec is a privacy-focused L2 with its own zkVM.

When to use ZK-Kit:

  • ✅ Building on Ethereum L1 or other chains
  • ✅ Need application-level primitives
  • ✅ Want language flexibility (JS/Circom/Solidity/Noir/Rust)
  • ✅ Integrating ZK into existing apps

When to use Aztec:

  • ✅ Building privacy-focused dApps on Aztec
  • ✅ Need programmable privacy by default
  • ✅ Want to leverage Aztec's infrastructure

vs Arkworks​

Arkworks is a Rust ecosystem for zkSNARK programming.

When to use ZK-Kit:

  • ✅ Building web/Node.js applications
  • ✅ Need TypeScript/JavaScript
  • ✅ Want quick integration
  • ✅ Prefer higher-level abstractions

When to use Arkworks:

  • ✅ Building performance-critical systems
  • ✅ Need maximum control over cryptography
  • ✅ Working in Rust
  • ✅ Developing custom proof systems

vs OpenZeppelin (Contracts)​

OpenZeppelin provides Solidity contracts for Merkle proofs.

When to use ZK-Kit:

  • ✅ Need off-chain tree generation
  • ✅ Building the application layer
  • ✅ Want multiple tree types (IMT, LeanIMT, SMT)
  • ✅ Need TypeScript/JavaScript integration

When to use OpenZeppelin:

  • ✅ Only need on-chain verification
  • ✅ Using standard Merkle trees
  • ✅ Want battle-tested Solidity code

Can you use both? Yes! Common pattern:

// ZK-Kit generates tree and proofs off-chain
import { IMT } from "@zk-kit/imt"
const tree = new IMT(poseidon2, 16, 0, 2)
const proof = tree.createProof(0)

// OpenZeppelin verifies on-chain
// contract uses @openzeppelin/contracts/utils/cryptography/MerkleProof.sol

Feature Comparison​

Merkle Trees​

LibraryIMTLean IMTSMTGas Optimized
ZK-Kit✅✅✅✅
Circomlib❌❌✅⚠️
OpenZeppelin⚠️ Basic❌❌✅

Signatures​

LibraryEdDSA-PoseidonEdDSA-BabyJubJubECDSA
ZK-Kit✅✅❌
Circomlib✅✅❌
Ethers.js❌❌✅

Encryption​

LibraryPoseidon CipherAESRSA
ZK-Kit✅❌❌
Circomlib❌❌❌
Web Crypto❌✅✅

Performance Comparison​

Tree Operations (1M leaves)​

LibraryInsertProof GenVerifyMemory
ZK-Kit IMT2.1ms8ms3ms1GB
ZK-Kit LeanIMT2.5ms10ms3ms100MB
CircomlibN/AN/AN/AN/A

Circomlib is circuit-only, no off-chain implementation

Bundle Size​

LibraryMinMin+GzipTree-Shakeable
@zk-kit/imt12KB4KB✅
snarkjs500KB150KB⚠️
circomlibjs200KB60KB⚠️

Language Availability​

TypeScript/JavaScript​

LibraryOfficial Support
ZK-Kit✅ Native
SnarkJS✅ Native
Circomlib⚠️ Via circomlibjs
Arkworks❌

Circom​

LibraryCircuits Available
ZK-Kit✅ Yes (zk-kit.circom)
Circomlib✅ Yes (extensive)
Semaphore✅ Yes (protocol-specific)

Solidity​

LibraryContracts Available
ZK-Kit✅ Yes (zk-kit.solidity)
OpenZeppelin✅ Yes
Circomlib⚠️ Limited

Ecosystem Integration​

Works With​

ZK-Kit integrates seamlessly with:

  • ✅ Circom - For circuit development
  • ✅ SnarkJS - For proof generation
  • ✅ Ethers.js/Web3.js - For blockchain interaction
  • ✅ Next.js/React - For web applications
  • ✅ Hardhat/Foundry - For smart contract development

Used By​

Major projects using ZK-Kit:

  • Semaphore - Anonymous signaling protocol
  • MACI - Anti-collusion voting
  • Worldcoin - Proof of personhood
  • Zupass - Privacy-preserving tickets
  • Privacy Pools - Private transactions

Decision Matrix​

Choose ZK-Kit when you need:

RequirementZK-KitAlternative
TypeScript app✅ ExcellentSnarkJS (lower-level)
Merkle trees✅ ExcellentCircomlib (circuits only)
Quick integration✅ ExcellentArkworks (more complex)
Multiple languages✅ GoodCircomlib (Circom only)
Production-ready✅ ExcellentVarious (check audits)
Custom circuits⚠️ Use circomCircomlib
Rust performance❌ Use Rust libsArkworks

Migration Resources​

Moving from another library?

Summary​

Use ZK-Kit when:

  • Building TypeScript/JavaScript applications
  • Need ready-to-use Merkle trees and cryptographic primitives
  • Want comprehensive documentation and examples
  • Need production-ready, audited code
  • Want modular, tree-shakeable packages

Consider alternatives when:

  • Writing low-level circuits (→ Circomlib)
  • Generating custom proofs (→ SnarkJS)
  • Building on specific protocols (→ Semaphore, Aztec)
  • Need maximum Rust performance (→ Arkworks)

Best of both worlds: Combine ZK-Kit with other tools:

  • ZK-Kit for application logic
  • Circom for custom circuits
  • SnarkJS for proof generation
  • OpenZeppelin for smart contracts

Next Steps​

On This Page

Page: Comparison
Edit this page